The Justice Network
Telephone Recording
Highest Quality Telephone Recording Equipment
Highest Quality Telephone Recording Equipment
At DynaMetric, we've been in the telephone recording equipment
industry for over two decades. Our years of expertise have imbued us with knowledge about the intricacies of this business. As a result, our cell phone recorders prove to be of the highest quality available. If you're in the market
for cell phone recording software, we can help you out!
Our phone taps serve our customers well in a wide variety of
contexts, from recording telephone calls made from land lines to those associated with
web-based communication forms. Our phone recording devices can help you out, no matter what your individual requirements.
With our capacity for cell phone recording,
we maintain our extreme commitment to high level customer service, to provide assistance with any of our products. Don't hesitate to contact us if we can be helpful in
any way, or if you have questions about any item in our inventory!
Also, check out our informative articles for more information.
DynaMetric, Inc., Arcadia, California
I have used DynaMetric Call Saver Pro for years, it is a great product and highly recommended. I found it indispensable for accurately obtaining medical information over the phone from doctor’s offices while caring for my Mother with Alzheimer’s disease. See the Harvard Health Letter below for the benefits of recording doctor visits. Check your local recording laws.
Harvard Health Letter
Harvard Medical SchoolHarvard Health Letter
Harvard Health Letter Volume 29, Number 9, 2004
Tip No. 8: Bring a tape recorder to your office visit. This may seem intrusive, but - especially if you have a serious medical condition like cancer or heart disease that involves complicated
treatment choices -listening to an audiotape after your visit may help you understand things you didn't grasp the first time around. Just refreshing your memory can be helpful. Canadian researchers
published a study of audiotaping visits last year in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. They found that breast cancer patients who listened to an audiotape of their first appointment about
chemotherapy had significantly better recall of having discussed the side effects than did patients who didn't listen to a tape.
Volume 29, Number 9, July, 2004
Harvard Health Letter, July 2004, Vol 29[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [182.2 KB]
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP)
Reporters Committee - Can we tape?
Can we tape? A Practical Guide to Taping Phone Calls and In-Person Conversations in the 50 States
and Washington D.C.
Federal law allows recording of phone calls and other electronic communications with the consent of at least one party to the call. A majority of the states and territories have adopted wiretapping
statutes based on the federal law, although most also have extended the law to cover in-person conversations. Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia permit individuals to record
conversations to which they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing so. These laws are referred to as "one-party consent" statutes, and as long as you are a party to the
conversation, it is legal for you to record it. (Nevada also has a one-party consent statute, but the state Supreme Court has interpreted it as an all-party rule.) Read more here.
Reporters Committee - Florida guide to recording
RCFP, Florida guide to recording
All parties must consent to the recording or the disclosure of the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication in Florida. Recording, disclosing, or
endeavoring to disclose without the consent of all parties is a felony, unless the interception is a first offense committed without any illegal purpose, and not for commercial gain. Fla. Stat. ch.
934.03. These first offenses and the interception of cellular frequencies are misdemeanors. State v. News-Press Pub. Co., 338 So. 2d 1313 (1976).
Under the statute, consent is not required for the taping of a non-electronic communication uttered by a person who does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that communication. See
definition of "oral communication," Fla. Stat. ch. 934.02. See also Stevenson v. State, 667 So.2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996); Paredes v. State, 760 So.2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000).
In Cohen Brothers, LLC v. ME Corp., S.A., 872 So.2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004), the District Court of Appeal for the Third District of Florida held that members of a limited liability company’s
(LLC) management committee did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to participation in telephone conference calls with other committee members to discuss continued financing of
the LLC, and thus could not hold the committee members liable for recording the conference calls.
A federal appellate court has held that because only interceptions made through an "electronic, mechanical or other device" are illegal under Florida law, telephones used in the ordinary course of
business to record conversations do not violate the law. The court found that business telephones are not the type of devices addressed in the law and, thus, that a life insurance company did not
violate the law when it routinely recorded business-related calls on its business extensions. Royal Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991).
Anyone whose communications have been illegally intercepted may recover actual damages or $100 for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater, along with punitive damages, attorney fees
and litigation costs. Fla. Stat. ch. 934.10.
Online Sunshine, Internet Site of the Florida Legislature
Chapter 934, Florida Statutes, Security of Communications
934.01(3) Organized criminals make extensive use of wire and oral communications in their criminal activities. The interception of such communications to obtain evidence of the commission of crimes or to prevent their commission is an indispensable aid to law enforcement and the administration of justice. Read more here
Security of Communications
Chapter 934, Fla. Stat., Security of Com[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [196.3 KB]
Florida Case Law
Royal Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991)
924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991)
Royal Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Jeffer[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [67.8 KB]
State v. News-Press Pub. Co., 338 So. 2d 1313 (1976)
Stevenson v. State, 667 So.2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Paredes v. State, 760 So.2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Cohen Brothers, LLC v. ME Corp., S.A., 872 So.2d 321
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Security of Communications (James Publishing)
James Publishing
Security of Communications (James Publis[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [284.8 KB]
My disclosure
All calls on home office business telephone extension (352) 854-7807 are recorded for quality assurance purposes pursuant to the business use exemption of Florida Statutes chapter 934, section 934.02(4)(a)(1) and the holding of Royal Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991).
Notice of Recording, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit
December 30, 2009
2009, 12-30-09, Plaintiff's Notice of Te[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [177.8 KB]
Notice, Mr. Rodems Consent to Record Phone Calls
December 29, 2006
2006, 12-29-06, Notice, Mr. Rodems Conse[...]
Adobe Acrobat document [151.5 KB]
Florida Monitors and/or Records Your Phone Calls
Gov. Rick ScottFlorida Monitors and/or Records Your Phone Calls - Many Florida government agencies and businesses do!
Office of Governor Rick Scott
(850) 488-7146
Print